Young Indians have given up on engineering
and MBA degrees considering the chances of getting a job to be very grim. Frustrated
engineers and business graduates are now taking jobs for which they are
overqualified and, therefore, underpaid.
In India, while some time ago, the
number and quality of the engineering institutes were enough to produce
technically skilled people in the country. Creamy layer used to be in IIT’s,
Good students used to be in NIT’s and average people used to be in Govt. engineering
colleges. Things were justified at that point. But everything got jeopardized when
the number of engineering colleges rose up.
Needless to say, the popularity of the
engineering was mostly due to IT and it's capability to offer even a mediocre
student a job of Rs. 20K/month. In this jazzy world of IT, everybody forgot one
vital fact. Engineering is NOT all about IT/Computers and IT itself is NOT
equal to Computer Science. Today every sensible Engineer would say with me - IT
has been very successful in destroying two streams of engineering that goes by
the name Computer Science and Electronics and Communication engineering.
Some of the myths that parents and students get trapped into
- One should be a professional such as a doctor, lawyer or an engineer to be successful in life. Other degree programmes are not useful.
- Marks scored in higher secondary are a true reflection of one’s intelligence, and the one who has scored more than 95% is the most intelligent than others.
- Those who studied higher secondary education in vernacular medium cannot shine in professional courses.
- Unemployment is high, so campus placement is the only hope.
- An engineering degree in the most popular branch, with 8.0 CGPA and above will definitely fetch a job.
In order to overcome poor placements
and get most of their students placed, non IITs and tier two engineering
colleges are coming up with alternative ways. They are plunging to newer
industries apart from IT, compromising on lower salary packages, inviting more
companies and bringing entrepreneurship in limelight.
So here is my analysis of why I do not
have an optimistic suggestion to pursue an engineering degree
Case 1 - If they belong to a Tier- 3 college in the outskirts of a metro city:
- They undoubtedly took up engineering because it gets you an “established career" and somewhere somebody told them an engineering degree is a prestigious one.
- All through those four years they realized that they made a huge mistake
- They were expecting a placement at the completion of four years, but due to massive competition and lack of skills they failed to get one and that now look for other options for earning.
- Ramu, Somu, and Raju - all are doing MBA, so I’ll do the same
- But if they are among the 20% people in these colleges, who are actually interested in engineering AND have the recommended skills too, they fail to get a placement because they are not prepared to work in a small startup and want work in TCS and TCS will not hire them unless they belong to a tier 2/1 college or are exceptionally brilliant with super-duper communication skills. So they look for other options.
Case 2 - If they belong to tier 1 college (IIT, BITS and all their copartners)
- Companies willingly hire them ( I am talking about those companies who reject Tier 3 brilliant students but fluster for Tier 1 average students because of their "TAG" ) to provide them a steady life is foreseen.
- But now they do not value the steady life.
- They want more. They are IITians. They don't want to be working "under" someone. So they go on building up their “own startups” or go to California to pursue “MBA” and have "FUN".
Tier 3 engineering graduates always
wonder what makes their education pathetic. Well its tiny bits of structure,
admin, the students themselves and much more. Nobody is concerned on how to
transform the already existing low grade colleges which are serving no purpose
other than giving way an engineering degree at the end of four years
Well, I thought about what can be done to change the scenario, and here are some pointers that my brain came up with:
1. Admissions not on the basis of competitive MCQ based exams or the score in the higher secondary:
An engineer should have a bit of creativity,
imaginative thinking, ability to research and a genuine interest in stuff. What
AIEEE and JEE (sorry IITians) test is how a set mathematical problems can be
solved in the minimum possible time. Now Euler’s theorem and Taylor’s series
are important but what’s their use if you cannot apply them. And for
application you need a brain which is aware, thinking and interested in the
application itself, not in getting a job at TCS. Those kinds of brains can be
sorted out when the admission selection criteria has some sort of analytic
skills testing. People with real stuff should come forward to join such a
course. Not anybody who can afford to repay an education loan for an
engineering course.
2. Introducing practical based study in the curriculum:
We have all watched the 3 Idiots movie
a humpty number of times. So I needn’t elaborate on this.
3. Exams in the form of minor projects based on theory studied throughout the semester:
This is an extension of the point
above. Chuck away as much theory based exams as possible. This will stop the
trend of people mugging and passing exams. In Tamilnadu and other major states
all the muggers are tagged as toppers. But when these enter into corporate
world they rarely shine.
4. Introduction of personality development sessions in curriculum:
Many students may have the talent and
aptitude but lack awareness and conversational skills. Now these sessions are
available in many colleges but they suck big time. Again, there is nothing beneficial
standard on in that part. We requisite to have people who know how to create an
impact on the student’s personality and any XYZ with good English will not do.
5. Batch of not more than 25 to 30 students in a class:
Putting up a herd of students into a
single class room will fetch nothing except noise.
6. Tie ups with various start-ups and not just high end companies:
Everyone needs practical talent. Be it
TCS or a startup in sake. The college admin must have tie ups with these
companies and show them the practical projects these students make. The
companies will definitely be interested in hiring these children rather than a
mugger who is a 9 pointer.
7. Encourage students in
all ways possible:
Every student will have their own
talents. Institution should be able to find them out and encourage them in their
respective interest apart from books.
8. Provide students with
ample knowledge on various streams of knowledge:
Institutes must provide ample
knowledge on the real world. Don’t make students glued to books and exams.
9. Don’t prioritize students
based on the marks:
Don’t rank people according to their
marks rather find the real star among the group.
10. This is for the students - Don’t consider engineering a money fetching mechanism:
If money is the only purpose of taking
an engineering course, then wait for surprises.
There is much more to say…
No comments:
Post a Comment